home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: seaeagle.csi.cam.ac.uk!ag129
- From: ag129@ucs.cam.ac.uk (A. Grant)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: PL/I and C
- Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 18:16:52
- Organization: University of Cambridge
- Message-ID: <ag129.168.0012487D@ucs.cam.ac.uk>
- References: <4gh5ru$eng@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> <4h11ub$njp@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> <TANMOY.96Feb28085159@qcd.lanl.gov> <4h8vte$s76@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> <4h9t5l$hkk@solutions.solon.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: seaeagle.csi.cam.ac.uk
-
- In article <4h9t5l$hkk@solutions.solon.com> seebs@solutions.solon.com (Peter Seebach) writes:
- >> sprint would appear to be comparable in intent to PUT STRING.
-
- >You're forgetting the "f". Which is apparently because you lack the
- >conceputal framework. sprintf-> string print *formatted*. Those formats
- >are awe-inspiringly powerful.
-
- Awe-inspiring? It can't even put commas into numbers, which is about
- the most basic requirement of printing formatted numbers.
-
- And PUT STRING with EDIT _is_ a formatted string print.
-